Search for: "Sinclair v. Metropolitan Life"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
The court’s eagle eyes spied a Tennessee appellate court decision that rejected the argument that a person’s life was a “thing of value” under the Tennessee statute:[T]he General Assembly intended for the Consumer Protection Act to be used by a person claiming damages for an ascertainable loss of money or property due to an unfair or deceptive act or practice and not in a wrongful death action.2011 WL 1259650, at *3 (quoting Kirksey v. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 5:37 pm
Dept. of Ins. v. [read post]
